<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 487 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104926</link>
    <description>Clubbing of clearances for small-scale exemption requires cogent material showing that separately registered units are in substance one manufacturer, supported by evidence of financial flow back or other real interdependence; common facilities or family connection alone are insufficient. On the stated record, the clearances could not be clubbed. A demand for clandestine manufacture and removal must rest on positive evidence of production capacity, process, and actual removal of finished goods; stock discrepancies or alleged raw-material shortages by themselves are not enough. The alleged clandestine demand therefore failed. Penalties and interest, being consequential to a valid duty demand, also could not survive once the duty demand failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:50:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 487 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104926</link>
      <description>Clubbing of clearances for small-scale exemption requires cogent material showing that separately registered units are in substance one manufacturer, supported by evidence of financial flow back or other real interdependence; common facilities or family connection alone are insufficient. On the stated record, the clearances could not be clubbed. A demand for clandestine manufacture and removal must rest on positive evidence of production capacity, process, and actual removal of finished goods; stock discrepancies or alleged raw-material shortages by themselves are not enough. The alleged clandestine demand therefore failed. Penalties and interest, being consequential to a valid duty demand, also could not survive once the duty demand failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>