<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 478 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential reliefs to the appellants based on the damaged condition of the goods and the applicability of Section 23 for refund/remission of the duty paid. The Tribunal distinguished between Sections 13 and 23 of the Customs Act, concluding that the appellants were entitled to the refund/remission of duty as the goods were damaged and not cleared, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:28:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 478 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential reliefs to the appellants based on the damaged condition of the goods and the applicability of Section 23 for refund/remission of the duty paid. The Tribunal distinguished between Sections 13 and 23 of the Customs Act, concluding that the appellants were entitled to the refund/remission of duty as the goods were damaged and not cleared, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>