https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104908 A suit by a private-company employee seeking declaration of continued employment and mandatory injunction for reinstatement and salary was held not maintainable because it was, in substance, enforcement of a contract of personal service. Such contracts are not ordinarily specifically enforceable, so the proper remedy for wrongful termination is damages, not reinstatement. A declaration of subsisting employment under the Specific Relief Act does not override the bar on specific enforcement, and injunction is unavailable to restrain breach of a contract that cannot be specifically enforced. No recognised exception, such as Article 311, industrial dispute protection, or action by a statutory body, applied. en-us Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:24:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104908 A suit by a private-company employee seeking declaration of continued employment and mandatory injunction for reinstatement and salary was held not maintainable because it was, in substance, enforcement of a contract of personal service. Such contracts are not ordinarily specifically enforceable, so the proper remedy for wrongful termination is damages, not reinstatement. A declaration of subsisting employment under the Specific Relief Act does not override the bar on specific enforcement, and injunction is unavailable to restrain breach of a contract that cannot be specifically enforced. No recognised exception, such as Article 311, industrial dispute protection, or action by a statutory body, applied. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104908