<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 796 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104903</link>
    <description>Consumer status under the Consumer Protection Act requires a completed purchase of goods or hiring of services for consideration. A mere application for allotment of shares, before allotment, does not create such a relationship and leaves the applicant only as a prospective investor. On that basis, the District Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum had no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint relating to share allotment, and the writ petitions were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:18:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 796 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104903</link>
      <description>Consumer status under the Consumer Protection Act requires a completed purchase of goods or hiring of services for consideration. A mere application for allotment of shares, before allotment, does not create such a relationship and leaves the applicant only as a prospective investor. On that basis, the District Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum had no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint relating to share allotment, and the writ petitions were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>