<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 409 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104895</link>
    <description>An idler roller classifiable under heading 84.31 was treated as capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q for the relevant period, because the item was specifically excluded only from 23-07-1996 and the credit claim related to 13-07-1996. On that factual basis, there was no ground to deny the benefit for the period in question, and the order under challenge was found to suffer from no infirmity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:09:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 409 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104895</link>
      <description>An idler roller classifiable under heading 84.31 was treated as capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q for the relevant period, because the item was specifically excluded only from 23-07-1996 and the credit claim related to 13-07-1996. On that factual basis, there was no ground to deny the benefit for the period in question, and the order under challenge was found to suffer from no infirmity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>