<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 932 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104890</link>
    <description>Where parties have exchanged correspondence and transaction documents showing at least a prima facie commercial dealing, the existence of a concluded contract containing an arbitration agreement may not be finally determined at the section 11 appointment stage. Section 7 requires an arbitration agreement to be in writing, including through signed documents or exchanged communications recording assent, while section 16 reserves to the arbitral tribunal the power to rule on its own jurisdiction and on objections to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement. In that setting, the disputed question was left open for the tribunal, and the matter was referred to arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 932 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104890</link>
      <description>Where parties have exchanged correspondence and transaction documents showing at least a prima facie commercial dealing, the existence of a concluded contract containing an arbitration agreement may not be finally determined at the section 11 appointment stage. Section 7 requires an arbitration agreement to be in writing, including through signed documents or exchanged communications recording assent, while section 16 reserves to the arbitral tribunal the power to rule on its own jurisdiction and on objections to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement. In that setting, the disputed question was left open for the tribunal, and the matter was referred to arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>