https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104870 A declaration under section 22(3) of SICA can be extended only by the BIFR, and the High Court will not use writ jurisdiction to grant that relief in the first instance. Because Articles 226 and 227 confer supervisory, not original, jurisdiction in this context, a petitioner must first approach the statutory forum for extension. Requisition of the record by the High Court does not justify bypassing the BIFR. The maintainability of the writ petition therefore depends on prior recourse to the designated authority. en-us Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:18:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104870 A declaration under section 22(3) of SICA can be extended only by the BIFR, and the High Court will not use writ jurisdiction to grant that relief in the first instance. Because Articles 226 and 227 confer supervisory, not original, jurisdiction in this context, a petitioner must first approach the statutory forum for extension. Requisition of the record by the High Court does not justify bypassing the BIFR. The maintainability of the writ petition therefore depends on prior recourse to the designated authority. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104870