<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 628 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104869</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held admissible for the disputed items as capital goods. Applying the Supreme Court&#039;s ratio in Jawahar Mills, the Tribunal treated items falling within the functional ambit of capital goods used in manufacture as eligible for credit. The lower appellate authority&#039;s allowance of the credit was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:17:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 628 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104869</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held admissible for the disputed items as capital goods. Applying the Supreme Court&#039;s ratio in Jawahar Mills, the Tribunal treated items falling within the functional ambit of capital goods used in manufacture as eligible for credit. The lower appellate authority&#039;s allowance of the credit was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>