https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104860 Supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 does not permit reappreciation of AAIFR's factual findings on sickness under the Sick Industrial Companies Act unless the findings are perverse, unsupported by material, or affected by jurisdictional or procedural error. For limitation under Section 25, the word "issued" means effective communication or service of the order by the Board, and "any person aggrieved" is wide enough to include an unsecured creditor. The text also notes that rejection of a withdrawal request may be upheld where the appeal has already been fully contested on merits and no legal or procedural infirmity is shown. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:00:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104860 Supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 does not permit reappreciation of AAIFR's factual findings on sickness under the Sick Industrial Companies Act unless the findings are perverse, unsupported by material, or affected by jurisdictional or procedural error. For limitation under Section 25, the word "issued" means effective communication or service of the order by the Board, and "any person aggrieved" is wide enough to include an unsecured creditor. The text also notes that rejection of a withdrawal request may be upheld where the appeal has already been fully contested on merits and no legal or procedural infirmity is shown. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104860