<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 614 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104854</link>
    <description>Proceedings against alleged intended receivers of smuggled silver were dropped because the record did not establish any intention to receive the goods or any concrete evidence supporting the allegation. On that evidentiary basis, the order dropping the proceedings was held justified, and the departmental challenge failed. The reasoning was also supported by the case law relied upon for the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:51:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 614 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104854</link>
      <description>Proceedings against alleged intended receivers of smuggled silver were dropped because the record did not establish any intention to receive the goods or any concrete evidence supporting the allegation. On that evidentiary basis, the order dropping the proceedings was held justified, and the departmental challenge failed. The reasoning was also supported by the case law relied upon for the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>