<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 986 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104847</link>
    <description>Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act gives a Financial Corporation a statutory right to take over and sell a defaulting industrial concern&#039;s assets, but that right is subject to the pari passu workmen&#039;s charge created by the proviso to section 529(1) of the Companies Act and the overriding priority given by section 529A. The later Companies Act provisions control the earlier special statute in winding up, so the Corporation&#039;s recovery powers must be exercised with the Company Court&#039;s supervision through the Official Liquidator. The stated legal position is that conditions preserving workmen&#039;s dues are lawful and the Corporation cannot ignore that charge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 986 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104847</link>
      <description>Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act gives a Financial Corporation a statutory right to take over and sell a defaulting industrial concern&#039;s assets, but that right is subject to the pari passu workmen&#039;s charge created by the proviso to section 529(1) of the Companies Act and the overriding priority given by section 529A. The later Companies Act provisions control the earlier special statute in winding up, so the Corporation&#039;s recovery powers must be exercised with the Company Court&#039;s supervision through the Official Liquidator. The stated legal position is that conditions preserving workmen&#039;s dues are lawful and the Corporation cannot ignore that charge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>