<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 685 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104839</link>
    <description>Modvat credit validly availed within the prescribed period and later reversed on exports could be re-credited after cancellation of advance licences without breaching Rule 57G(2). The later book entry was only a restoration of credit earlier debited when goods were exported under the DEEC scheme, not a fresh taking of credit on old invoices. Once the licences were cancelled, entitlement to the earlier reversed credit revived, so the six-month limitation did not apply to the re-crediting of credit already earned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:16:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 685 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104839</link>
      <description>Modvat credit validly availed within the prescribed period and later reversed on exports could be re-credited after cancellation of advance licences without breaching Rule 57G(2). The later book entry was only a restoration of credit earlier debited when goods were exported under the DEEC scheme, not a fresh taking of credit on old invoices. Once the licences were cancelled, entitlement to the earlier reversed credit revived, so the six-month limitation did not apply to the re-crediting of credit already earned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>