<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 974 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104830</link>
    <description>A bank decree in execution that falls within the Act&#039;s debt-recovery scheme is covered by the Tribunal&#039;s exclusive jurisdiction, and pending execution proceedings are transferable to the Tribunal. Section 31 is wide enough to include not only suits but also execution applications already pending before a Civil Court, while section 31A confirms that an unexecuted pre-amendment decree may be pursued before the Tribunal. The decree amount, including accrued interest, is relevant to determine whether the statutory threshold is met. To the extent of inconsistency, the special statute prevails over the Civil Procedure Code, so the Civil Court cannot continue with execution once the matter falls within the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 974 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104830</link>
      <description>A bank decree in execution that falls within the Act&#039;s debt-recovery scheme is covered by the Tribunal&#039;s exclusive jurisdiction, and pending execution proceedings are transferable to the Tribunal. Section 31 is wide enough to include not only suits but also execution applications already pending before a Civil Court, while section 31A confirms that an unexecuted pre-amendment decree may be pursued before the Tribunal. The decree amount, including accrued interest, is relevant to determine whether the statutory threshold is met. To the extent of inconsistency, the special statute prevails over the Civil Procedure Code, so the Civil Court cannot continue with execution once the matter falls within the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>