<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 669 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104819</link>
    <description>Conveyance confiscation under Customs law depends on proof that the owner or agent had knowledge of, or connived in, the transport of smuggled goods. Where the record and the driver&#039;s statement do not establish such knowledge or connivance, the statutory basis for confiscating the truck and imposing a personal penalty on the transporter is not satisfied. The analysis emphasises that mere carriage of contraband goods is insufficient by itself; the required mental element must be shown before liability under the confiscation and penalty provisions can be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:39:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 669 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104819</link>
      <description>Conveyance confiscation under Customs law depends on proof that the owner or agent had knowledge of, or connived in, the transport of smuggled goods. Where the record and the driver&#039;s statement do not establish such knowledge or connivance, the statutory basis for confiscating the truck and imposing a personal penalty on the transporter is not satisfied. The analysis emphasises that mere carriage of contraband goods is insufficient by itself; the required mental element must be shown before liability under the confiscation and penalty provisions can be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>