<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 528 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104816</link>
    <description>After concessional sales tax notifications were quashed, the State could not recover from assessees the tax amounts they had been prohibited from collecting from customers under the State Act. The Court noted that the assessees were not parties to the earlier proceedings and, under the relevant provisions, would have faced penalties if they had charged the concessional amount. Recovery in those circumstances would have been unfair and inequitable. The earlier order was therefore reviewed and clarified to prevent the State from collecting the tax that became payable only because of that order, with the result that recovery from the assessees was disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 528 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104816</link>
      <description>After concessional sales tax notifications were quashed, the State could not recover from assessees the tax amounts they had been prohibited from collecting from customers under the State Act. The Court noted that the assessees were not parties to the earlier proceedings and, under the relevant provisions, would have faced penalties if they had charged the concessional amount. Recovery in those circumstances would have been unfair and inequitable. The earlier order was therefore reviewed and clarified to prevent the State from collecting the tax that became payable only because of that order, with the result that recovery from the assessees was disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>