<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 657 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104807</link>
    <description>The tribunal proceeded with the case despite the absence of the appellant&#039;s counsel, based on the evidence on record. The judgment upheld the penalties imposed on the appellants for their involvement in the smuggling of contraband goods, citing confessional statements and material evidence collected by Customs officials. The penalties were reduced for each appellant, but the appeals were otherwise dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:06:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 657 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104807</link>
      <description>The tribunal proceeded with the case despite the absence of the appellant&#039;s counsel, based on the evidence on record. The judgment upheld the penalties imposed on the appellants for their involvement in the smuggling of contraband goods, citing confessional statements and material evidence collected by Customs officials. The penalties were reduced for each appellant, but the appeals were otherwise dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>