https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104790 The Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was treated as a self-contained code limited to measures concerning sick industrial companies and their assets, so BIFR and AAIFR could not adjudicate tenancy disputes, fix enhanced rent, or order eviction where tenancy was governed by separate rent legislation. The Court further noted that section 32 did not override tenancy law on this subject, Article 254 was not engaged because the statutes operated in distinct fields, and section 22(1) did not extend to such eviction proceedings. It also held that an adverse order affecting the petitioner's tenancy and liability could not stand without prior notice and a fair opportunity of hearing. en-us Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:41:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104790 The Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was treated as a self-contained code limited to measures concerning sick industrial companies and their assets, so BIFR and AAIFR could not adjudicate tenancy disputes, fix enhanced rent, or order eviction where tenancy was governed by separate rent legislation. The Court further noted that section 32 did not override tenancy law on this subject, Article 254 was not engaged because the statutes operated in distinct fields, and section 22(1) did not extend to such eviction proceedings. It also held that an adverse order affecting the petitioner's tenancy and liability could not stand without prior notice and a fair opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104790