<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 708 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104787</link>
    <description>Planting subsidy paid by sugar manufacturers to cane growers was treated as part of the consideration for sugarcane because it formed part of an integrated procurement arrangement linked to variety, quality and supply schedule, and was therefore includible in taxable turnover. Transport subsidy paid to secure delivery of cane beyond the stipulated distance was likewise held to be part of the sale consideration and includible in turnover, even though paid to third-party lorry owners. Penalty was not sustained, as non-inclusion of the subsidy amounts was based on a bona fide and debatable legal position rather than deliberate disregard of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 708 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104787</link>
      <description>Planting subsidy paid by sugar manufacturers to cane growers was treated as part of the consideration for sugarcane because it formed part of an integrated procurement arrangement linked to variety, quality and supply schedule, and was therefore includible in taxable turnover. Transport subsidy paid to secure delivery of cane beyond the stipulated distance was likewise held to be part of the sale consideration and includible in turnover, even though paid to third-party lorry owners. Penalty was not sustained, as non-inclusion of the subsidy amounts was based on a bona fide and debatable legal position rather than deliberate disregard of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>