<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 683 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104780</link>
    <description>Prima facie, complete air-conditioners were not covered by Notification No. 53/97-Cus., and the bill of entry description of the goods as components/parts supported the allegation of misdeclaration. On that basis, the Tribunal held that no strong prima facie case was made out for complete waiver of the penalty pre-deposit. Partial relief was therefore granted by directing a limited deposit towards penalty and waiving the balance pre-deposit, with stay of recovery on the amount deposited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 683 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104780</link>
      <description>Prima facie, complete air-conditioners were not covered by Notification No. 53/97-Cus., and the bill of entry description of the goods as components/parts supported the allegation of misdeclaration. On that basis, the Tribunal held that no strong prima facie case was made out for complete waiver of the penalty pre-deposit. Partial relief was therefore granted by directing a limited deposit towards penalty and waiving the balance pre-deposit, with stay of recovery on the amount deposited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>