<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 735 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104777</link>
    <description>Section 627 of the Companies Act, 1956 did not displace the general search-warrant powers under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and a shareholder was not among the persons entitled to invoke that provision. A search warrant for company records could still be issued under sections 91 and 93 where the records were relevant to the prosecution and kept at the company premises. The Court also treated the warrant as consistent with article 20(3) because it sought corporate documents rather than compelled testimony or personal production by the accused. The impugned warrant was therefore sustained and the challenge to search and seizure failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 735 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104777</link>
      <description>Section 627 of the Companies Act, 1956 did not displace the general search-warrant powers under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and a shareholder was not among the persons entitled to invoke that provision. A search warrant for company records could still be issued under sections 91 and 93 where the records were relevant to the prosecution and kept at the company premises. The Court also treated the warrant as consistent with article 20(3) because it sought corporate documents rather than compelled testimony or personal production by the accused. The impugned warrant was therefore sustained and the challenge to search and seizure failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>