<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 734 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104776</link>
    <description>Offences under the Companies Act, 1956 are governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 unless the Act itself creates a special procedure. The expression &quot;proceeding&quot; in section 446(2) was read as not including criminal prosecution, so the Company Court could not assume criminal jurisdiction over an offence under section 629 or direct a criminal inquiry under section 340 CrPC. Sections 621, 622 and 624 were noted as reinforcing that cognizance, forum and non-cognizable status are controlled by the statutory criminal process, while section 454(5A) shows that Parliament confers Company Court criminal powers expressly when intended.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:19:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 734 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104776</link>
      <description>Offences under the Companies Act, 1956 are governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 unless the Act itself creates a special procedure. The expression &quot;proceeding&quot; in section 446(2) was read as not including criminal prosecution, so the Company Court could not assume criminal jurisdiction over an offence under section 629 or direct a criminal inquiry under section 340 CrPC. Sections 621, 622 and 624 were noted as reinforcing that cognizance, forum and non-cognizable status are controlled by the statutory criminal process, while section 454(5A) shows that Parliament confers Company Court criminal powers expressly when intended.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>