<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 968 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104766</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking approval for the amalgamation between two companies under Section 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found the scheme to be unfair and unreasonable, highlighting issues related to financial transactions that were not adequately explained and appeared to be unfair. As a result, the court concluded that the conditions projected were incorrect, leading to the dismissal of the petition for approval of the amalgamation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 968 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104766</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking approval for the amalgamation between two companies under Section 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found the scheme to be unfair and unreasonable, highlighting issues related to financial transactions that were not adequately explained and appeared to be unfair. As a result, the court concluded that the conditions projected were incorrect, leading to the dismissal of the petition for approval of the amalgamation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>