<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1088 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104758</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed appeals C/104 &amp;amp; 188/87, set aside the impugned orders, partially allowed appeal C/92/87 concerning duty on bulgur wheat, and dismissed appeals C/147 and 148/87. The judgment clarified the application of Section 116 of the Act on duty eligibility for short landed goods, emphasizing the burden of proof on the person in charge and the specific conditions for duty exemptions on goods like bulgur wheat and CSM.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:00:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1088 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104758</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed appeals C/104 &amp;amp; 188/87, set aside the impugned orders, partially allowed appeal C/92/87 concerning duty on bulgur wheat, and dismissed appeals C/147 and 148/87. The judgment clarified the application of Section 116 of the Act on duty eligibility for short landed goods, emphasizing the burden of proof on the person in charge and the specific conditions for duty exemptions on goods like bulgur wheat and CSM.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>