https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104747 The Registrar of Companies was treated as a "person aggrieved" for section 469(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in the statutory context of section 621(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, which authorises complaints by the Registrar, a shareholder, or a Central Government nominee. The expression was not confined narrowly to the immediate transferee or allottee. Criminal liability under section 113(2) was held distinct from the civil or compensatory remedy under section 113(3), so the right to prosecute did not depend on action under section 113(3). Limitation ran from the date the default came to the complainant's knowledge, and a complaint filed within six months was within time. en-us Thu, 11 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104747 The Registrar of Companies was treated as a "person aggrieved" for section 469(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in the statutory context of section 621(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, which authorises complaints by the Registrar, a shareholder, or a Central Government nominee. The expression was not confined narrowly to the immediate transferee or allottee. Criminal liability under section 113(2) was held distinct from the civil or compensatory remedy under section 113(3), so the right to prosecute did not depend on action under section 113(3). Limitation ran from the date the default came to the complainant's knowledge, and a complaint filed within six months was within time. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 11 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104747