<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1067 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104733</link>
    <description>Approved classification lists claiming exemption benefits can support a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit in a stay application. Where the list was accepted subject to clubbing of clearances for computing the slab under one exemption notification, the Tribunal treated that approval as relevant to balance of convenience and granted waiver of pre-deposit pending appeal. The relief was limited to the hearing of the appeal and did not determine the substantive duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:30:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1067 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104733</link>
      <description>Approved classification lists claiming exemption benefits can support a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit in a stay application. Where the list was accepted subject to clubbing of clearances for computing the slab under one exemption notification, the Tribunal treated that approval as relevant to balance of convenience and granted waiver of pre-deposit pending appeal. The relief was limited to the hearing of the appeal and did not determine the substantive duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>