<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 549 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104725</link>
    <description>State power under section 10(2) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was confined to enlarging Schedule I by adding goods or relaxing conditions and exceptions; it did not extend to excluding goods already included. Section 21 of the Madhya Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1957 was inapplicable because Schedule I formed part of the Act itself, not a subordinate notification. The legal effect is that an exemption schedule may be widened or its conditions eased, but it cannot be narrowed by executive notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 549 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104725</link>
      <description>State power under section 10(2) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was confined to enlarging Schedule I by adding goods or relaxing conditions and exceptions; it did not extend to excluding goods already included. Section 21 of the Madhya Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1957 was inapplicable because Schedule I formed part of the Act itself, not a subordinate notification. The legal effect is that an exemption schedule may be widened or its conditions eased, but it cannot be narrowed by executive notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>