https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104706 Stay of operation was refused where the Revenue failed to show a sufficient ground to suspend the order allowing the respondent's appeal and directing refund credit. The Tribunal noted that evidence before the Commissioner had already been accepted to show that the incidence of duty had not been passed on. It also considered the parity of prices with other EOUs and the view that depreciation on imported capital goods would not affect pricing. On that material, no basis for interim relief was established and the stay application was dismissed. en-us Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:36:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104706 Stay of operation was refused where the Revenue failed to show a sufficient ground to suspend the order allowing the respondent's appeal and directing refund credit. The Tribunal noted that evidence before the Commissioner had already been accepted to show that the incidence of duty had not been passed on. It also considered the parity of prices with other EOUs and the view that depreciation on imported capital goods would not affect pricing. On that material, no basis for interim relief was established and the stay application was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104706