<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 930 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104687</link>
    <description>The court upheld the amalgamation order of three companies into a new entity, finding it valid despite objections raised by shareholders. The court determined that the scheme had been approved by a majority of shareholders, creditors had not opposed it, and valuation methods were deemed acceptable. The court dismissed concerns regarding non-disclosure of shareholding interests and merging profit-making companies into a loss-making entity. Additionally, the court rejected the appeal challenging the existence of the pre-amalgamated company, concluding that the objections lacked merit and upheld the lower court&#039;s decision to sanction the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 930 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104687</link>
      <description>The court upheld the amalgamation order of three companies into a new entity, finding it valid despite objections raised by shareholders. The court determined that the scheme had been approved by a majority of shareholders, creditors had not opposed it, and valuation methods were deemed acceptable. The court dismissed concerns regarding non-disclosure of shareholding interests and merging profit-making companies into a loss-making entity. Additionally, the court rejected the appeal challenging the existence of the pre-amalgamated company, concluding that the objections lacked merit and upheld the lower court&#039;s decision to sanction the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>