<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 657 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104673</link>
    <description>Items used as integral components or auxiliaries of plant and machinery in manufacturing operations, including chlorine blowing, brine processing, cooling and steam-related functions, were treated as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q. The Revenue&#039;s objection that the goods did not directly produce or process final products was rejected because the rule extends to goods covered by its explanation when used in relation to manufacture. Relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s governing principle on the scope of capital goods, the items were held eligible for Modvat credit and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:44:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 657 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104673</link>
      <description>Items used as integral components or auxiliaries of plant and machinery in manufacturing operations, including chlorine blowing, brine processing, cooling and steam-related functions, were treated as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q. The Revenue&#039;s objection that the goods did not directly produce or process final products was rejected because the rule extends to goods covered by its explanation when used in relation to manufacture. Relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s governing principle on the scope of capital goods, the items were held eligible for Modvat credit and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>