<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 917 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104671</link>
    <description>The court allowed the application, directing the Court Receiver to hand over possession of the premises to the Official Liquidator, who would then return it to the applicant. The Official Liquidator&#039;s report was made absolute, upholding the applicant&#039;s ownership rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 917 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104671</link>
      <description>The court allowed the application, directing the Court Receiver to hand over possession of the premises to the Official Liquidator, who would then return it to the applicant. The Official Liquidator&#039;s report was made absolute, upholding the applicant&#039;s ownership rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>