<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 715 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104646</link>
    <description>The court allowed the application, modifying the previous order to protect the rights of the applicants. The judgment emphasized addressing collusion, interpreting orders accurately, and considering fraudulent actions in legal proceedings. Costs of the application were to be borne as part of the winding up petition, and all parties were directed to act in accordance with the court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:16:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 715 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104646</link>
      <description>The court allowed the application, modifying the previous order to protect the rights of the applicants. The judgment emphasized addressing collusion, interpreting orders accurately, and considering fraudulent actions in legal proceedings. Costs of the application were to be borne as part of the winding up petition, and all parties were directed to act in accordance with the court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>