<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 796 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104635</link>
    <description>Winding-up under the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be used to compel payment of a debt bona fide disputed on substantial grounds. A pre-existing quality dispute, settlement request, payment of the admitted amount, civil proceedings for damages and return of cheques, and bank funds sufficient to meet the cheque liability supported a plausible defence. These circumstances did not establish commercial insolvency or loss of substratum. The winding-up petition was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:00:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 796 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104635</link>
      <description>Winding-up under the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be used to compel payment of a debt bona fide disputed on substantial grounds. A pre-existing quality dispute, settlement request, payment of the admitted amount, civil proceedings for damages and return of cheques, and bank funds sufficient to meet the cheque liability supported a plausible defence. These circumstances did not establish commercial insolvency or loss of substratum. The winding-up petition was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>