https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104627 The court dismissed the petition challenging the appointment of respondent No. 2 as Chairman of SEBI. It found no violation of rules or arbitrary exercise of power, upholding the appointment for a five-year term. The court emphasized the lack of public interest in the petition and the petitioner's delay in filing, ultimately dismissing the case and imposing costs of Rs. 10,000. en-us Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104627 The court dismissed the petition challenging the appointment of respondent No. 2 as Chairman of SEBI. It found no violation of rules or arbitrary exercise of power, upholding the appointment for a five-year term. The court emphasized the lack of public interest in the petition and the petitioner's delay in filing, ultimately dismissing the case and imposing costs of Rs. 10,000. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104627