<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 232 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104625</link>
    <description>Cognizance of offences under the Companies Act, 1956 is confined to complaints by persons having statutory locus under section 621, namely the Registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorised by the Central Government, save for offences falling within the statutory exception. Where no shares or debentures were allotted and the refund of application money had been sent, the complainant and his wife were not shareholders and therefore lacked competence to initiate the complaint. As the alleged offences did not fall within the exception, the criminal proceedings were unsustainable and were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:39:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 232 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104625</link>
      <description>Cognizance of offences under the Companies Act, 1956 is confined to complaints by persons having statutory locus under section 621, namely the Registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorised by the Central Government, save for offences falling within the statutory exception. Where no shares or debentures were allotted and the refund of application money had been sent, the complainant and his wife were not shareholders and therefore lacked competence to initiate the complaint. As the alleged offences did not fall within the exception, the criminal proceedings were unsustainable and were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>