<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 575 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104588</link>
    <description>The appellant challenged a winding up order, contending the Company Judge lacked power to dispense with publication requirements. The Court upheld the order, citing factual grounds. The appellant&#039;s assertion of a time-barred debt was dismissed, as it was not raised earlier. Claims of adequate assets were rejected for lack of evidence. The Court found the appeal unsustainable and dismissed it, granting a temporary stay on the judgment&#039;s operation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 575 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104588</link>
      <description>The appellant challenged a winding up order, contending the Company Judge lacked power to dispense with publication requirements. The Court upheld the order, citing factual grounds. The appellant&#039;s assertion of a time-barred debt was dismissed, as it was not raised earlier. Claims of adequate assets were rejected for lack of evidence. The Court found the appeal unsustainable and dismissed it, granting a temporary stay on the judgment&#039;s operation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>