https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104578 The Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Issue of Share Certificates) Rules, 1960 regulated the issue of duplicate share certificates but did not create an exclusive adjudicatory forum for disputes over such relief. Civil jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 therefore remained available where the Act did not expressly provide otherwise. Territorial jurisdiction was to be assessed from the plaint; on the pleaded facts, a part of the cause of action arose in Calcutta because the shares were alleged to have been sent from there and not returned there. A rebuttable presumption of service under Section 53 did not conclusively negate that pleaded cause of action. en-us Fri, 27 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104578 The Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Issue of Share Certificates) Rules, 1960 regulated the issue of duplicate share certificates but did not create an exclusive adjudicatory forum for disputes over such relief. Civil jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 therefore remained available where the Act did not expressly provide otherwise. Territorial jurisdiction was to be assessed from the plaint; on the pleaded facts, a part of the cause of action arose in Calcutta because the shares were alleged to have been sent from there and not returned there. A rebuttable presumption of service under Section 53 did not conclusively negate that pleaded cause of action. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104578