https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104576 A delay of 1,085 days in filing an appeal was not condoned because the appellant failed to give a sufficient, continuous and bona fide explanation for the entire period of inaction. The Bench found the explanation about managerial responsibility and disruption after the managing director's death and the manager's departure to be unsatisfactory, and also noted further unexplained inaction after notice of demand was issued. Laches disentitled the appellant to relief, so the condonation application was rejected and the stay application and appeal were dismissed. en-us Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:15:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104576 A delay of 1,085 days in filing an appeal was not condoned because the appellant failed to give a sufficient, continuous and bona fide explanation for the entire period of inaction. The Bench found the explanation about managerial responsibility and disruption after the managing director's death and the manager's departure to be unsatisfactory, and also noted further unexplained inaction after notice of demand was issued. Laches disentitled the appellant to relief, so the condonation application was rejected and the stay application and appeal were dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104576