https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104550 The court rejected the application for contempt of court due to the failure to prove willful disobedience of a court undertaking relied upon for passing an order. The judge emphasized the importance of timely filing such applications and clarified the Company Court's jurisdiction limitations in monetary matters. The petitioner's case was weakened by filing the application beyond the permissible time limit, leading to the rejection of the contempt application with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 28 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:10:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104550 The court rejected the application for contempt of court due to the failure to prove willful disobedience of a court undertaking relied upon for passing an order. The judge emphasized the importance of timely filing such applications and clarified the Company Court's jurisdiction limitations in monetary matters. The petitioner's case was weakened by filing the application beyond the permissible time limit, leading to the rejection of the contempt application with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 28 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104550