<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 527 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104548</link>
    <description>Under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1959, &quot;manufacture&quot; was construed in its expanded statutory sense, covering producing, collecting, extracting, preparing, or making goods. Because the definition was not limited to the creation of a new article, authorities under narrower enactments were not decisive. Mechanically cutting bulky iron and steel scrap into smaller pieces suitable for rolling mills and foundries was held to be a process that prepared and made the goods saleable, and therefore fell within the statutory meaning of manufacture. The appellants were entitled to the exemption, and the High Court&#039;s view was reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 527 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104548</link>
      <description>Under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1959, &quot;manufacture&quot; was construed in its expanded statutory sense, covering producing, collecting, extracting, preparing, or making goods. Because the definition was not limited to the creation of a new article, authorities under narrower enactments were not decisive. Mechanically cutting bulky iron and steel scrap into smaller pieces suitable for rolling mills and foundries was held to be a process that prepared and made the goods saleable, and therefore fell within the statutory meaning of manufacture. The appellants were entitled to the exemption, and the High Court&#039;s view was reversed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>