<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1095 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104542</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was found admissible on Ramming Mass, Tundish Board, Lancing Pipe, Foundry Fluxes and Automatic Starter. The appellate authority&#039;s grant of credit was upheld because it had relied on earlier Tribunal decisions, and the mere filing of reference applications by the Revenue did not suspend the operation of those decisions. On the facts, the goods were accepted as eligible inputs and no infirmity was found in allowing credit, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:52:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1095 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104542</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was found admissible on Ramming Mass, Tundish Board, Lancing Pipe, Foundry Fluxes and Automatic Starter. The appellate authority&#039;s grant of credit was upheld because it had relied on earlier Tribunal decisions, and the mere filing of reference applications by the Revenue did not suspend the operation of those decisions. On the facts, the goods were accepted as eligible inputs and no infirmity was found in allowing credit, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>