<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 728 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104527</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on explosives used in mines for cement manufacture was held unavailable because the claim was covered by the Larger Bench ruling in Jaypee Rewa Cement, which had already settled that a cement manufacturer cannot take credit on such explosives. Applying that binding precedent, the denial of credit was sustained and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:29:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 728 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104527</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on explosives used in mines for cement manufacture was held unavailable because the claim was covered by the Larger Bench ruling in Jaypee Rewa Cement, which had already settled that a cement manufacturer cannot take credit on such explosives. Applying that binding precedent, the denial of credit was sustained and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>