<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 710 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104519</link>
    <description>A Board circular prescribed monetary limits for adjudication of Central Excise matters, while excluding cases relating to approval of classification and price lists. Where duty demands arose only after disallowance of an assessee&#039;s claim to maintain two price lists for different dealers, the dispute was treated as a consequential duty-demand matter, not as a case relating to approval of the price list itself. The text states that the Commissioner (Appeals) was correct in holding that the Assistant Collector&#039;s order exceeded the circular&#039;s adjudicatory limits and in remanding the matter, and that the appeal was dismissed in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 710 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104519</link>
      <description>A Board circular prescribed monetary limits for adjudication of Central Excise matters, while excluding cases relating to approval of classification and price lists. Where duty demands arose only after disallowance of an assessee&#039;s claim to maintain two price lists for different dealers, the dispute was treated as a consequential duty-demand matter, not as a case relating to approval of the price list itself. The text states that the Commissioner (Appeals) was correct in holding that the Assistant Collector&#039;s order exceeded the circular&#039;s adjudicatory limits and in remanding the matter, and that the appeal was dismissed in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>