<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 377 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104517</link>
    <description>In winding-up proceedings, personal liability of directors may arise where misapplication of assets, breach of duty, negligence, non-cooperation, or inaction causes company assets or debts to become irrecoverable, and liability may also follow for unsupported expenditure. The discussion notes that time-barred recoveries, failure to supply correct addresses to the official liquidator, and absence of vouchers can support a finding of misfeasance and breach of duty if unrebutted by evidence. It also states that personal liability cannot be imposed without proof that a person was in fact a director during the relevant period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 377 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104517</link>
      <description>In winding-up proceedings, personal liability of directors may arise where misapplication of assets, breach of duty, negligence, non-cooperation, or inaction causes company assets or debts to become irrecoverable, and liability may also follow for unsupported expenditure. The discussion notes that time-barred recoveries, failure to supply correct addresses to the official liquidator, and absence of vouchers can support a finding of misfeasance and breach of duty if unrebutted by evidence. It also states that personal liability cannot be imposed without proof that a person was in fact a director during the relevant period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>