https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104508 The court denied the permanent injunction sought by the plaintiffs against the defendants for using the name "Manipal" in their business names and publicizing themselves as part of the "Manipal group." The court found that the name "Manipal" did not have an exclusive secondary meaning associated solely with the plaintiffs' companies and that both parties, being part of the Pai family, had the right to use the term. Additionally, the court dismissed the claim for damages of Rs. 10 lakhs, stating that the plaintiffs had not provided sufficient evidence to support their losses. en-us Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:12:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104508 The court denied the permanent injunction sought by the plaintiffs against the defendants for using the name "Manipal" in their business names and publicizing themselves as part of the "Manipal group." The court found that the name "Manipal" did not have an exclusive secondary meaning associated solely with the plaintiffs' companies and that both parties, being part of the Pai family, had the right to use the term. Additionally, the court dismissed the claim for damages of Rs. 10 lakhs, stating that the plaintiffs had not provided sufficient evidence to support their losses. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104508