https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104444 The High Court of Madras upheld the lower court's decision to dismiss the application for condonation of delay in filing a complaint against a company for making an advertisement inviting deposits without permission from the Central Government. Emphasizing equality before the law, the court ruled that even technical defects should be rectified promptly, especially when the delay is deliberate and unexplained. The court highlighted the need for the State to provide explanations for delays in legal proceedings. As there was no valid explanation for the delay in this case, the High Court dismissed the revision, allowing the lower court to proceed with the complaint against other accused parties. en-us Tue, 08 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:30:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104444 The High Court of Madras upheld the lower court's decision to dismiss the application for condonation of delay in filing a complaint against a company for making an advertisement inviting deposits without permission from the Central Government. Emphasizing equality before the law, the court ruled that even technical defects should be rectified promptly, especially when the delay is deliberate and unexplained. The court highlighted the need for the State to provide explanations for delays in legal proceedings. As there was no valid explanation for the delay in this case, the High Court dismissed the revision, allowing the lower court to proceed with the complaint against other accused parties. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 08 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104444