https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104441 Consequential relief could not be granted where the appellant had failed to comply with the conditions attached to an earlier appellate order that had attained finality between the parties. The prior order had limited Modvat credit to cases where the supplier obtained registration before 31-12-94, and that condition was never challenged. Because the present claim depended entirely on that final order, relief was unavailable without strict compliance with its terms. The rejection of the claim was therefore sustained. en-us Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:24:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104441 Consequential relief could not be granted where the appellant had failed to comply with the conditions attached to an earlier appellate order that had attained finality between the parties. The prior order had limited Modvat credit to cases where the supplier obtained registration before 31-12-94, and that condition was never challenged. Because the present claim depended entirely on that final order, relief was unavailable without strict compliance with its terms. The rejection of the claim was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104441