https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104433 The appeals challenged an order confirming duty on fabrics clandestinely manufactured and cleared by a silk mill, amounting to Rs. 86,92,118, with penalties imposed on the mill's director and traders. Confiscation of assets and fabrics occurred due to non-compliance, leading to a detailed analysis of evidence and submissions. The judgment scrutinized the computation of duty evaded based on seized documents, credibility of post-search filings, and financial aspects, directing further deposits. The decision addressed the legality and justification of confiscations and penalties, emphasizing the complexities of duty evasion adjudication. en-us Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:04:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104433 The appeals challenged an order confirming duty on fabrics clandestinely manufactured and cleared by a silk mill, amounting to Rs. 86,92,118, with penalties imposed on the mill's director and traders. Confiscation of assets and fabrics occurred due to non-compliance, leading to a detailed analysis of evidence and submissions. The judgment scrutinized the computation of duty evaded based on seized documents, credibility of post-search filings, and financial aspects, directing further deposits. The decision addressed the legality and justification of confiscations and penalties, emphasizing the complexities of duty evasion adjudication. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104433