https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104401 A claim for proof of debt was rejected because the applicant failed to produce the original receipts relied on, and the explanation for their loss was not consistently disclosed before the Official Liquidator. The alleged police complaint and supporting particulars were also not produced or furnished. On that factual basis, the High Court found no denial of opportunity to lead secondary evidence and upheld the rejection of the claim. en-us Mon, 02 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:49:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104401 A claim for proof of debt was rejected because the applicant failed to produce the original receipts relied on, and the explanation for their loss was not consistently disclosed before the Official Liquidator. The alleged police complaint and supporting particulars were also not produced or furnished. On that factual basis, the High Court found no denial of opportunity to lead secondary evidence and upheld the rejection of the claim. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 02 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104401