<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 442 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104393</link>
    <description>A sale of secured assets by a secured creditor after presentation of a winding-up petition, but before the winding-up order, falls within the winding-up regime and requires Court approval under Sections 536(2) and 537 of the Companies Act, 1956; the sale can be confirmed if it is bona fide. After the 1985 amendments, the workmen&#039;s pari passu charge under Sections 529 and 529A must also be protected, so any approval of such a sale must safeguard the workmen&#039;s dues and allow the Official Liquidator to realise their share from the proceeds. The purchaser may be protected, but subject to conditions securing statutory priority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 442 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104393</link>
      <description>A sale of secured assets by a secured creditor after presentation of a winding-up petition, but before the winding-up order, falls within the winding-up regime and requires Court approval under Sections 536(2) and 537 of the Companies Act, 1956; the sale can be confirmed if it is bona fide. After the 1985 amendments, the workmen&#039;s pari passu charge under Sections 529 and 529A must also be protected, so any approval of such a sale must safeguard the workmen&#039;s dues and allow the Official Liquidator to realise their share from the proceeds. The purchaser may be protected, but subject to conditions securing statutory priority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>