<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 512 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104388</link>
    <description>Notional interest on advances received from customers was held not includible in assessable value unless a proven nexus existed between the advance and the sale price. Where advances were taken only in some cases and no link was shown between the advance and any reduction in price, the presumed benefit of interest not actually paid could not be added to valuation. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:29:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 512 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104388</link>
      <description>Notional interest on advances received from customers was held not includible in assessable value unless a proven nexus existed between the advance and the sale price. Where advances were taken only in some cases and no link was shown between the advance and any reduction in price, the presumed benefit of interest not actually paid could not be added to valuation. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>